# Annotated synthetic client summary

Fictional exercise; reporting date 2026-08-31. These decisions were authored for the exercise, not produced by a tested model. Open synthetic-sources.en-US.md while reviewing.

## Draft and annotations

1. **S1: “For the August 31, 2026 reporting date, approved net revenue v2 excludes shipping.”** Citation: metric.net_revenue.v2. **Supported.** The exact passage is “VAT and shipping are excluded.” Approved version 2 is effective 2026-07-01. Keep the date and version.
2. **S2: “This source proves that the workflow saves two hours per week.”** Citation: metric.net_revenue.v2. **Unsupported.** No passage measures time or savings. Remove the statement; do not invent an estimate.
3. **S3: “Current approved net revenue includes shipping.”** Citation: metric.net_revenue.v3_draft. **Misleading.** The document says “DRAFT proposal, not approved.” It proposes including shipping from 2026-10-01, while the exercise asks about August. Approved v2 excludes shipping. Replace with the v2 statement; mention the proposal separately only if needed.

## Corrected summary

For the August 31, 2026 reporting date, approved net revenue v2 excludes shipping. [metric.net_revenue.v2, version 2, effective 2026-07-01; Text: “VAT and shipping are excluded.”]

## Optional separate context

An unapproved v3 draft proposes including shipping from October 1, 2026. [metric.net_revenue.v3_draft, version 3-draft; Text: “DRAFT proposal, not approved.” and “Proposed effective date 2026-10-01.”]

The saving is removed because no measurement is supplied. The optional proposal sentence is not an approved August definition. Source verification grants no permission to send a real client summary.